https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-e&q=%22waymorgue%22
]]>Didn’t work
]]> Thanks for your answer. It’s not necessarily a not an answer I didn’t expect, I even calculated that into the process. If the CPS or who ever deemed this is not harmful or abusive to children or even adults, it would put them on record, documenting their conclusions, for future repercussions that may occur because of masking a child for a full school day. Let’s be real, there is little or no precedent or studies of effects of masking a child for extended periods of time. Logically and from the evidence with CO2 metering we know this condition is created and the side effects of oxygen depletion and higher levels of CO2 in the blood stream known. I submit to the doctors who aren’t bought off, or afraid of losing their careers would speak out when it comes to children. Nobody is proffering proof that masks are shielding anyone from any viral invader, and honestly quite the opposite holds true. The possibility that some people or children will be hurt by masking after long term usage is highly probable. I know as my partner is allergic to masking and also inflames her asthma when wearing the masks.
Therefore, in the long run by getting them on the record will be crucial for claiming damages for ignoring the obvious and quite frankly any physician that endorses such an insane claim that masking children need not be a physician or hold any job in a healthcare after this comes to its inevitable conclusion.
It’s time to take them to task over this and eliminate spineless people from our healthcare industry.
Hi Ron.
Whenever anyone suspects “child abuse,” the authorities will take the child to the ER, or a specific physician (usually a pediatrician) who is the expert in that area, and will get there evaluation. The charges of “child abuse,” can be significantly damaging to the accused, and yet no medical provider wants to miss this diagnosis. Therefore, it’s difficult to get that diagnosis without having some physical evidence. The Exception would be some kind of “psychological abuse.” Due to the politics, and medical boards, the pressure would be for the use of masks. I do not know what the pediatric medical board recommends at the age to wear a mask. You will either get the medical specialties recommendation, or the personal opinion of the medical provider.Sadly, the court considers the doctor’s opinion, as “Evidence.” The medical providers would not be measuring the oxygen or CO2 content under the mask. They might check oxygen saturation with a small clamp on the finger or earlobe. Normal O2 saturation is 95 – 99%. But typically, insurance companies do not consider they should pay for oxygen supplementation, until it’s down to (I believe) 88%. I have had patients with significant need of oxygen at the 90 – 92% level. You are not going to get them to call it “abuse,” unless the child is turning blue or is breathing extremely rapidly.
Probably, the first problem that children of this age might experience, would be a runny nose, and an ear infection. They may also develop a cough, wheeze or lung infection (viral or bacterial). But most doctors will not attribute it to the mask, or at best might recommend only a few days without the mask. probably, the only way they would consider the mask being the cause of the problem, is if the child as recurrent infections that follow closely after treatment.
(Note: a woman I see a couple times a week at a “quick stop,” ruptured both eardrums, and might require surgical debridement of a bone behind the ear, that is attributed to her mask. Her medical provider only wrote a note for four days, without the mask. I told her I would have made her exempt from the mask, if I was still practicing medicine. Note #2: She is always happy to see me, and always takes her mask off when I check out. Seeing that I wear hearing aids, she is exempt from the mask to accommodate my “disability.” I have yet to put on a mask, and I live in communist California.)
I hope that helps. But I know it is not the answer you wanted.
]]>Dead link
]]>