Comments on: DOJ Documents: Rosenstein Expanded Russia Probe Beyond Scope, Obama and Biden Knew Details From Flynn’s Wire-Tapped Calls

By: Our Spirit

Our Spirit — Mon, 11 May 2020 22:23:30 +0000

In reply to Mara Williams. This is what we want to know...what AIM thinkers think.

By: Mara Williams

Mara Williams — Mon, 11 May 2020 18:25:06 +0000

I spent a few months with Judy Mikovits after she got out of jail. She spent time at our clinic in Santa Rosa consulting with us. She is a hero. She is telling the truth. The trauma she suffered at the hands of Fauci et al is real. I interviewed her back then as well. She is legit.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 11 May 2020 16:27:47 +0000

check out this long and lengthy thread someone on twitter put together – this person made it easy to repost to each criminal traitor right back on their twitter accounts for the world to see the crimes they should be tried for https://twitter.com/WarNuse/status/1108161451628339201?s=20

By: Our Spirit

Our Spirit — Mon, 11 May 2020 11:32:23 +0000

In reply to Richard Pack. Thank you, Rich.

By: Saheike1

Saheike1 — Mon, 11 May 2020 09:41:54 +0000

They are fucked checkers not fact checkers

By: Saheike1

Saheike1 — Mon, 11 May 2020 09:39:27 +0000

SHARE BEFORE DELETED – WHO Planned Training & Simulation Exercise in September 2019

By: Richard Pack

Richard Pack — Mon, 11 May 2020 07:50:04 +0000

Hello,

Is this quoted article in AAAS’s flagship publication, Science — science or politics?

Fact-checking Judy Mikovits, the controversial virologist attacking Anthony Fauci in a viral conspiracy video
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/fact-checking-judy-mikovits-controversial-virologist-attacking-anthony-fauci-viral

1- Science has had corrupted articles in the past:

Editor at Journal ‘Science’ Doubles Down on Double Standard
https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/02/12/editor-journal-science-doubles-down-double-standard-14569

AAAS Runs Dishonest Glyphosate Story, Then Deletes It. Is Politics to Blame?
https://www.acsh.org/news/2019/02/05/aaas-runs-dishonest-glyphosate-story-then-deletes-it-politics-blame-13786

2- Science supports the consensus, but is that really good science?

American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) – Media Bias Fact Check
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-association-for-the-advancement-of-science-aaas/

AAAS always supports the consensus of science. For example, in 2006 they wrote “The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society….The pace of change and the evidence of harm have increased markedly over the last five years. The time to control greenhouse gas emissions is now.”

Overall, AAAS is a Pro-Science source that promotes the consensus in all matters. (D. Van Zandt 10/5/2016) Updated (8/25/2019)

Promoting the consensus is fine, up to a point. But, what if some outstanding and rigorous research comes up with issues that poke holes in the consensus? How does AAAS’s Science handle that?

3- The whole scientific journal process is eroding its integrity.

Science Is Suffering Because of Peer Review’s Big Problems
https://newrepublic.com/article/135921/science-suffering-peer-reviews-big-problems

The future(s) of open science – Philip Mirowski
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0306312718772086

4- I have listened to Judy Mikovits and she seems to have a great deal of integrity. Does that make it true? No. But the initial article, at the start of my comments, from Science, seems more like a set of political statements, like mud-slinging without facts, like accusations without any examples to back the accusations up.

the Best,
Rich Pack

By: Duane Weber

Duane Weber — Mon, 11 May 2020 03:50:43 +0000

What would the authors of the Mikovits critique say of Fauci? I am betting it would be 180 from Mikovits. I read the book and found it very credible.

By: tlsmith

tlsmith — Mon, 11 May 2020 03:46:01 +0000

Dr. Mikovits comes up 100% Genuine to me. — tls

Human Retroviruses and Chronic Disease –
https://youtu.be/gCY1LlzLXew
https://youtu.be/rhZETbXCqCM

By: rol1

rol1 — Mon, 11 May 2020 03:40:02 +0000

If the patents you shared were used to spread a virulent strain of limited generations of effectively , how would these virus nano cannons be dispersed?
In food or drink like the banquet in Woohan? Would the viruses have to be kept at temperatures? Would cooking all your foods kill the virus? Could a cold drink be a medium of infection?
I think Douglas said that the virulence of the virus mutates every generation of host. Could that be taken into consideration in tracking releases? Are we being attacked with deadly viruses to blow up the paranoia while testing is blowing up the case count?