Comments on: Washington crime families circle the wagon to protect their adult children

By: Our Spirit

Our Spirit — Sat, 07 Dec 2019 21:33:48 +0000

In reply to Libertyordeath. Don't waste our time or insult our researchers with blathering about "Q".

By: Libertyordeath

Libertyordeath — Sat, 07 Dec 2019 20:13:50 +0000

Much respect Tyla and Douglas,

Kudos for the piece validating RFB on his awesome work and your development of “The CUBE”!
I’m wondering if the “contact the white house” link (that is The Office of Presidential Correspondence) is the best way for us to “vote” for anything? Isn’t it where Obummer hold overs intercept and subvert POTUS?
The “Q” movement, I believe, is worth another look due to some recent proofs and venue changes that allowed POTUS to vet Q. In my humble opinion, I believe it is the way Trump is keeping us informed of his plan, while reteaching the Socratic method to those who have trouble w/critical thinking and might be a potential conduit straight to him. I’m not techy enough to know if thats even possible, but feel better about asserting it to allow the community to ponder.
Great work Super Patriots!

Toodles

By: Our Spirit

Our Spirit — Fri, 06 Dec 2019 23:47:26 +0000

In reply to jodi@krainapastries.com. We aren't interested in Webb's report. He is in a different area of the internet.

By: don@daglobalenergy.com

don@daglobalenergy.com — Fri, 06 Dec 2019 22:20:24 +0000

Dear AIM, I enjoy your newsletters, very sharp !Please excuse me, I wish to comment on thorium article, it seemsthat has been around in labs since 40’s and I read that uranium hasslight upper hand (cause GOV can sell it and its weapon grade).I have patented and working on a extremely efficient MAGNETICenergy generator (fuel less noise less light weight operates 24/365)More importantly, our magnetic generator is designed to be quasi-portablein that it can be manually moved around by power dolly or fork lift (under 2klb)and because of this offers local-placement (called DISTRIBUTED GENERATION)whereas existing power generation is CENTRALIZED (gigawatts one site thentransformed and distributed down power lines for miles to clients business miles away)The losses just in heat from having to travel long distances across resistive linesresults in 15-30% gone by time it gets to the receiving end clients, WE DONT HAVE THESE ISSUES -BECAUSE WE ARE LOCAL INSIDE BUILDING RIGHT ALONGSIDEOUR GENERATOR (even Nuclear or Thorium is central power plants)So the tech direction is DISTRIBUTED vs CENTRALIZED POWER GENERATION(think of distributed computing vs the old IBM Central Process Mainframes)Unfortunately i worked in IBM System dev two decades and they held onto centralprocessing too long and standardized the PC world (I designed the IBM industrial PC power)The other new tech for energy is called IOT (or EOT) Internet of things OR energy of thingswhich just means adding a IT Data Connection to monitor critical rel. parameters like temperaturespower consumed and flow rate, etc etc, )As a Buddhist i shy from atomic, fukishima & various superfund mil sites arent convincing Nuke is safe,(shelf life is far far too long, lets not leave surprises for our future generations) My honorable opinion only, please feel free to engage me in discussion or discard, either wayHappy Holidays May Buddha Bless You (Nam Myoho Renge Kyo) !! & Peace be with you, Don,

By: jodi@krainapastries.com

jodi@krainapastries.com — Fri, 06 Dec 2019 16:22:16 +0000

Dear Tyla, Doug, and Michael,

You guys need to hook up with George Webb, the Webb Report. He’s on the ground doing boots on the ground reporting and he’s uncovering it all, names, dates, times, places, The Who, how, why, what, when, and where!

Please check him out on youtube. We’ve got to keep him and John O Loughlin, Kennedy’s man to smash the CIA.

By: Eliza Ayres

Eliza Ayres — Fri, 06 Dec 2019 15:58:58 +0000

Reblogged this on Blue Dragon Journal.